You can watch the full interview tonight from The National here by clicking on the link at the top of the page. Mesley also spoke with CBC News Now’s Andrew Nichols about the unusual experience of sitting down with Gaga, as film crews micromanaged the spotlights illuminating Gaga, while hordes of young fans – Gaga’s Little Monsters – screamed loudly just outside. It's not what showbiz is about at all, and I don't have to do all those things to curate my own legacy.” “It's not, and it's also not what music is. We think that all celebrities are just taking photos of their ass on Instagram for attention and that this is what art is,” she told Mesley. “It's about this sort of place that we're in society where we're confused about famous people, we're confused about celebrities. Gaga said that her single Applause is about her relationship with fame, what that means to her and what it can mean to others. They discussed Gaga’s new album, whether her outrageous performances are for shock value alone, her surprisingly traditional upbringing and more. Known for her outrageous outfits as much as for her music, the singer’s flamboyant shows have led some to wonder whether she's more style than substance.Īs part of her promotional tour, Gaga sat down with CBC’s Wendy Mesley for a feature interview. I love the subject.Lady Gaga is back with Artpop, her third studio album. I'd be interested in talking more, if you are. But it turns out I'm extremely passionate about art presentation and how access and exploration can be magnified.ĭang, now I want to pick this up again. I'm actually not a big art enthusiast myself. I imagine a Kandinsky-like work that changes subtly over minutes, hours, or weeks. Where the image itself slowly changes either by artistic effort (strictly dictated change) and algorithmic. W bazie tapet znajdziemy najciekawsze zbiory obrazów i grafik znanych artystów. Then, there is also the ability to deliver art that is not static, which I think will develop soon. Artpip jest niewielkim narzdziem, które nieustannie dziaajc w tle automatycznie zmienia to pulpitu. TV brings vast scale and new presentation abilities, which I think will complement the power and complexity of individual static works. That's where I see the future of art in digital form: bringing it into the home and school, and augmenting the experience within the museum. Or superimpose their hands to visually guide your eye as it's discussed. In the light form, imagine watching curator talks when they can serve up high-resolution images and zoom in to specific features, or highlight and "pull out" sections side by side. You can visualize the _genre_ and _time_ in a way few can at an art museum.Īlso think about AR and VR experiences. With the TV+software experience, you can construct progressions of an artist's work, quickly build visual trees showing change and relationship of art genres. There's a to be said for volume in art viewing too. My thinking is education and exploration. You'll never get that close to a real van Gogh, breathing on it and with a magnifying glass! You can achieve closeness and magnification far beyond what you can at an art museum. With a 4K screen (even the super-cheap one I bought 3 years ago) and sufficient scanning resolution you can zoom in and see the paint clinging to individual fibers of canvas. However, they enable a lot of other abilities that let you experience art in a very different way. It's true, TVs don't have the same experience the painting. I think there are several markets in art delivery but it will take connections, money, and luck to prise it open. And Google who uses it as a culture talking point and just-good-enough feature in their products. And on payer side you have numerous free art resources from museums. Companies working in this area have a market on one side of artists who have little money, so you are a cost to them even to digitize their works. To elaborate on a tough situation, Google does show some contemporary art in its Chromecast rotations but the artist is not reimbursed for it. But may do a Kickstarter of the device or run a simplified version of the software people could access for free or very cheap and see if any interest develops. Essentially A Spotify for Art with both public domain and contemporary art. I had a startup that was working on easy art access. Art is low on the list of things most people want to access regularly, let alone pay for. Neither is customizable nor allows any interaction and discovery, but it's just good enough as free to make it tough to do anything unique at the consumer end. Google invests heavily in art and offers it on Chromecast as a screensaver. Art software startups are a tough proposition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |